Zło i dobro to dwie strony tej samej monety i gdyby z jakiegoś powodu jedno przestało istnieć drugie także nie miało by racji bytu.

Dobro może jak najbardziej istnieć bez zła, ale zło bez dobra - nie.

Czyli Bóg dopuszczając zło nie jest w pełni miłosierny.To jest Jego widzimisię.

Totalna bzdura. Zło to brak (to znaczy niedobór) dobra. Dobro może jak najbardziej istnieć bez zła, ale zło bez dobra - nie. Trafne porównanie wymyślił człowiek podpisujący się jako J odpowiadający na pytania w serwisie wiara.pl w dziale "zapytaj" - zło jest jak dziura w skarpecie. Bez skarpety dziura nie istnieje.

Ile ludzi, tyle interpretacji. Niektórzy widzą świat wyłącznie w czarno-biało, inni szaro, różowo, czerwono itp.

Przyczyną zła jest grzech. .

I believe that the logical conclusion of felix culpa theology is the "utterly depraved" heresy of Luther, which I talked about two weeks ago. Felix culpa doesn't just suggests that the sin of Adam was necessary for Christ to come, it blatantly declares it: "O necessary sin of Adam." I believe that this is wrong. I believe that Christ would have come with, or without, Adam's sin.

I am not alone in this belief. I have been assured that Franciscan theology does not subscribe to felix culpa, for which, as a Franciscan, I am glad. As I said Five weeks ago, I am planning on studying more Franciscan theology (as appose to Thomistic theology). So far, however, I have not studied anything more than what's available on the Commission on the Franciscan Intellectual Tradition website, which makes no mention of felix culpa. The theology that I have been studying lately is John Paul II's Theology of the Body. Before studying this theology of John Paul, I would have said that felix culpa is wrong, but I could not formulate a reason why. Now that I've begun to study the Theology of the Body, John Paul has given me the reason why.

There are two trains of thought on this topic that John Paul has taught me; although, as a whole, these two trains of thought are entwined. The first one begins with St. Paul's letter to the Ephesians: "...even as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before Him." (Ephesians 1:4). On this verse, the Holy Father states, "before sin, man bore in his soul the fruit of eternal election in Christ." He goes further to say, "one must deduce that the reality of man's creation was already imbued with the perennial election of man in Christ....Man, male and female, shared from the 'beginning' in this supernatural gift." Again, he emphasises that this supernatural endowment in Christ "took place before original sin." Christ's humanity was pledged to us before Adam's sin; therefore, this sin was not necessary.

The second train of thought, which is just an embodiment of the first, lies in the physical and sexual nature of man. The confines of this e-mail will not allow me to adequately summarise the Theology of the Body, and what follows is woefully lacking. The relationship between us, the Church, and Christ was stamped into our bodies from the beginning. "So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female he created them." (Genesis 1:27). Man's sexuality defines who he is, and that is the "image of God." The purpose of the sexuality is for the male and the female to become one flesh. "Therefore a man leaves his father and mother and cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh." (Genesis 2:24). The physical love relationship between a husband and wife is not symbolic of Christ's relationship with the Church; it is the embodiment of Christ's relationship with the Church. This is why marriage is a sacrament; and not just a sacrament, the archetype of all other sacraments.

The sexual nature of man is the most profound theology, given to man from the very beginning, and physically stamped into his very existence. This theology existed before sin. Genesis 2:24 states that the man and woman became "one flesh" just before chapter 3 in Genesis, which describes the fall of man into sin. It was before sin that man and the woman became "one flesh." That is, it was before sin that Christ revealed what His relationship would be with the Church. Christ's coming into humanity was not the result of sin, but the result of His original plan, which, as a good God, did not entail sin.

The Incarnation was not God's way of rectifying man's deviation from His original plan; it was the original plan. Despite sin, God fulfilled what he prophetically, for lack of a stronger word, asserted in the creation of man.

For me, there is no debate. I believe that the Incarnation was not caused by sin, but that the Incarnation was the goal of creation, which is being achieved despite sin. This is not commonly held theology, but it is the theology that I subscribe to. I very much appreciate the beauty of the Exsúltet; however, I believe it is fatally flawed.

wolą Bożą nie było istnienie jakiegokolwiek zła!

Druga opcja. Cielesne może być wtedy, kiedy czysta genetycznie rasa ludzka akceptuje Jezusa i staje się Jego naśladowcami. Nasienie Szatana, ludzie - hybrydy, czyli wynik działalności upadłych aniołów, istoty nie posiadające Ducha Bożego, a więc nie objęte żadną obietnicą oraz nie zapisane w tzw. Księgach Żywota są owocem szatańskich grzechów oraz ofiarami ich wyuzdanych wyczynów. Czyli Nasienie to jest fizycznym nasieniem - wymieszanymi genami ludzkimi oraz demonicznymi.

Ra (Re) – bóg Słońca, stwórca świata i pan ładu we Wszechświecie. Czczony w starożytnym Egipcie, przedstawiany z dyskiem słonecznym, z głową sokoła. Uważano go za najważniejszego boga.

A zwłoki ich [leżeć] będą na placu wielkiego miasta,
które duchowo zwie się: Sodoma i Egipt,
gdzie także ukrzyżowano ich Pana

Jeżeli ktoś twierdzi, że wolą Pana było, żeby zło zaistniało, to zniekształca obraz Stwórcy w największym stopniu. I wówczas to Bóg staje się najbardziej niemoralną istotą, jaka może istnieć, Bóg nie jest wówczas Dobrem, lecz tylko Złem, Złem i jeszcze raz Złem.

Ciekawostka. Bóg solarny w Egipcie nazywał się Ra, a po hebrajsku ra' znaczy... zło!

Jeżeli ktoś twierdzi, że wolą Pana było, żeby zło zaistniało, to zniekształca obraz Stwórcy w największym stopniu